Stahl v. Unum

(Transcribed directly from Unum-provided documents.)

Activity (log)

Response: Kertay, Les P 02/27/2004 14:27:00:

Ms. Herbert’s analysis as presented in the 2/24/2004 review, as it pertains to psychiatric issues in the claim, adequately and succinctly captures the essence of our discussion and my review of the relevant data. I concur that the records available in the file, over a number of years and multiple providers, are suggestive of psychological factors that likely contribute to the claimant’s perception of pain and her reactions to it. However, there is no current documentation of treatment, evaluation, or clinical formulation that attributes impairment to psychiatric condition, either alone or as it might contribute to a general medical condition. I will be glad to discuss further or to respond to any questions.

Les Kertay, Ph.D., ABPP
VP, Medical Director
Licensed Health Services Provider (TN, GA)
Diplomate in Clinical Psychology, American Board of Professional Psychology


Date of first Unum denial letter: February 27, 2004

If you don't comment, I'll just assume you agree with me

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s