1/4/2009, Appeals court rules against Unum Group

http://www.businessinsurance.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=9999100026872

But the New York-based appeals court found that in light of a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Unum was operating under a conflict of interest. In Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. et al. vs. Wanda Glenn, the Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that lower courts should consider an insurer’s potential conflict of interest when reviewing employee benefit denial cases where the insurer is the claims administrator and the benefits payer…

If you don't comment, I'll just assume you agree with me

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s